Mir-155-5p targets TP53INP1 to promote proliferative phenotype in hypersensitivity pneumonitis lung fibroblasts.

Background: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an inflammatory disorder affecting lung parenchyma and often evolves into fibrosis (fHP). The altered regulation of genes involved in the pathogenesis of the disease is not well comprehended, while the role of microRNAs in lung fibroblasts remains unexplored. Methods: We used integrated bulk RNA-Seq and enrichment pathway bioinformatic analyses to identify differentially expressed (DE)-miRNAs and genes (DEGs) associated with HP lungs. In vitro, we evaluated the expression and potential role of miR-155-5p in the phenotype of fHP lung fibroblasts. Loss and gain assays were used to demonstrate the impact of miR-155-5p on fibroblast functions. In addition, mir-155-5p and its target TP53INP1 were analyzed after treatment with TGF-ß, IL-4, and IL-17A. Results: We found around 50 DEGs shared by several databases that differentiate HP from control and IPF lungs, constituting a unique HP lung transcriptional signature. Additionally, we reveal 18 DE-miRNAs that may regulate these DEGs. Among the candidates likely associated with HP pathogenesis was miR-155-5p. Our findings indicate that increased miR-155-5p in fHP fibroblasts coincides with reduced TP53INP1 expression, high proliferative capacity, and a lack of senescence markers compared to IPF fibroblasts. Induced overexpression of miR-155-5p in normal fibroblasts remarkably increases the proliferation rate and decreases TP53INP1 expression. Conversely, miR-155-5p inhibition reduces proliferation and increases senescence markers. TGF-ß, IL-4, and IL-17A stimulated miR-155-5p overexpression in HP lung fibroblasts. Conclusion: Our findings suggest a distinctive signature of 53 DEGs in HP, including CLDN18, EEF2, CXCL9, PLA2G2D, and ZNF683, as potential targets for future studies. Likewise, 18 miRNAs, including miR-155-5p, could be helpful to establish differences between these two pathologies. The overexpression of miR-155-5p and downregulation of TP53INP1 in fHP lung fibroblasts may be involved in his proliferative and profibrotic phenotype. These findings may help differentiate and characterize their pathogenic features and understand their role in the disease.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: From Common Microscopy to Single-Cell Biology and Precision Medicine.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic, progressive, and usually fatal lung disease of unknown etiology and is included in the large, complex, and heterogeneous group of interstitial lung diseases (ILD). IPF is characterized by an aberrant activation of epithelial cells and fibroblasts and excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix, resulting in the progressive destruction of the lung architecture. Here we approach the fascinating historical evolution of our knowledge about this disorder from the past century, when most efforts were focused on ILD classification and terminology, until the current century, when the explosive progress in molecular genetics, epigenetics, and multiomics, as well as the development of complex computational tools, resulted in a huge advance in unveiling the pathogenic mechanisms of the disease. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, machine and deep learning, and artificial neural networks show promising results in identifying lung fibrotic patterns in high-resolution computed tomography or helping to create a tissue genomic classifier for specific diagnosis. Finally, incipient approaches to precision medicine are ongoing in the area of pharmacogenetics.

Peripheral Blood Single-Cell Sequencing Uncovers Common and Specific Immune Aberrations in Fibrotic Lung Diseases.

Rationale and Objectives: The extent and commonality of peripheral blood immune aberrations in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases are not well characterized. In this study, we aimed to identify common and distinct immune aberrations in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) using cutting-edge single-cell profiling technologies. Methods: Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on patients and healthy controls' peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage samples using 10X Genomics 5' gene expression and V(D)J profiling. Cell type composition, transcriptional profiles, cellular trajectories and signaling, and T and B cell receptor repertoires were studied. The standard Seurat R pipeline was followed for cell type composition and differential gene expression analyses. Transcription factor activity was imputed using the DoRothEA-VIPER algorithm. Pseudotime analyses were conducted using Monocle3, while RNA velocity analyses were performed with Velocyto, scVelo, and CellRank. Cell-cell connectomics were assessed using the Connectome R package. V(D)J analyses were conducted using CellRanger and Immcantation frameworks. Across all analyses, disease group differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Measurements and Main Results: 327,990 cells from 83 samples were profiled. Overall, changes in monocytes were common to IPF and FHP, whereas lymphocytes exhibited disease-specific aberrations. Both diseases displayed enrichment of CCL3 hi /CCL4 hi CD14+ monocytes (p<2.2e-16) and S100A hi CD14+ monocytes (p<2.2e-16) versus controls. Trajectory and RNA velocity analysis suggested that pro-fibrotic macrophages observed in BAL originated from peripheral blood monocytes. Lymphocytes exhibited disease-specific aberrations, with CD8+ GZMK hi T cells and activated B cells primarily enriched in FHP patients. V(D)J analyses revealed unique T and B cell receptor complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) amino acid compositions (p<0.05) in FHP and significant IgA enrichment in IPF (p<5.2e-7). Conclusions: We identified common and disease-specific immune mechanisms in IPF and FHP; S100A hi monocytes and SPP1 hi macrophages are common to IPF and FHP, whereas GMZK hi T lymphocytes and T and B cell receptor repertoires were unique in FHP. Our findings open novel strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of IPF and FHP.

Mortality in patients with interstitial lung diseases hospitalized by severe or critical COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Since the first case of severe COVID-19, its effect on patients with previous interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been uncertain. We aimed to describe baseline clinical characteristics in ILD patients hospitalized by critical COVID and compare mortality during hospitalization. METHODS: We studied patients with ILD with COVID-19 and a control group matched by age, 1:2 ratio with COVID-19 without previous lung disease. On admission, laboratory tests and sociodemographic variables were evaluated. We evaluated patients critically ill and compared baseline characteristics and mortality in each group. Additionally, we performed a sub-analysis of ILD patients who died versus survivors. RESULTS: Forty-one patients and 82 controls were analyzed. In the group of ILD with COVID-19 there was a predominance of women (65 versus 33%: p < 0.001); lower leukocytes (9 ± 6 versus 11 ± 7, p = 0.01) and neutrophils (8 ± 5 versus 10 ± 6, p = 0.02). The most common ILD was secondary to autoimmune diseases. Patients with ILD and critical COVID-19 showed a significantly higher mortality compared with those without previous ILD (63 versus 33%, p = 0.007). Patients who died in this group had higher BMI (28 ± 6 versus 25 ± 4 kg/m2, p = 0.05), less extended hospital stay (20 ± 17 versus 36 ± 27 days, p = 0.01), and fewer days of evolution (9 ± 7 versus 16 ± 16, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found higher mortality in patients with ILD with critical COVID-19. Higher BMI and comorbidities were present in the non-survivors.

Usual interstitial pneumonia as a stand-alone diagnostic entity: the case for a paradigm shift?

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is characterised by a distinctive morphological and radiological appearance that was considered the pathognomonic hallmark of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, this peculiar lung remodelling pattern is also seen in other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases, including hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and connective tissue diseases. In this Personal View, we advocate the designation of a UIP pattern as a single, discrete diagnostic entity, amalgamating its primary form and secondary processes in disorders such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis (hypersensitivity pneumonitis with UIP), rheumatoid arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis with UIP), and others. The current separation between primary and secondary UIP is in keeping with the view that every individual interstitial lung disease must be viewed as a separate entity but does not reflect striking similarities between primary and secondary UIP in the morphological or radiological appearance, clinical behaviour, pathogenic pathways, and the efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy. We believe that the unification of UIP as a single diagnostic entity has undeniable advantages.

The HLA-DRB1*07 Allele Is Associated with Interstitial Lung Abnormalities (ILA) and Subpleural Location in a Mexican Mestizo Population.

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are defined as the presence of different patterns of increased lung density, including ground glass attenuation and reticular opacities on chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). In this study, we included 90 subjects with ILA and 189 healthy controls (HC) from our Aging Lung Program. We found that subjects with ILA are older, have a significant smoking history, and have worse pulmonary function than HC (p < 0.05). When we evaluated the allele frequencies of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, we found that HLA-DRB1*07 was associated with a higher risk for ILA (p < 0.05, OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.06-3.57). When we compared subjects with subpleural ILA vs. HC, the association with HLA-DRB1*07 became stronger than the whole ILA group (p < 0.05, OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.24-4.25). Furthermore, subjects with subpleural ILA and central ILA display differences in allele frequencies with HLA-DRB1*14 (3.33% vs. 13.33%, p < 0.05) and *15 (3.33% vs. 20%, p < 0.05). Our findings indicate that the HLA-DRB1*07 allele contributes to the risk of ILA, especially those of subpleural locations.

Lack of ZNF365 Drives Senescence and Exacerbates Experimental Lung Fibrosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by aberrant activation of the alveolar epithelium, the expansion of the fibroblast population, and the accumulation of extracellular matrix. Global gene expression of human lung fibroblasts stimulated with TGFß-1, a strong fibrotic mediator revealed the overexpression of ZNF365, a zinc finger protein implicated in cell cycle control and telomere stabilization. We evaluated the expression and localization of ZNF365 in IPF lungs and in the fibrotic response induced by bleomycin in WT and deficient mice of the orthologous gene Zfp365. In IPF, ZNF365 was overexpressed and localized in fibroblasts/myofibroblasts and alveolar epithelium. Bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis showed an upregulation of Zfp365 localized in lung epithelium and stromal cell populations. Zfp365 KO mice developed a significantly higher fibrotic response compared with WT mice by morphology and hydroxyproline content. Silencing ZNF365 in human lung fibroblasts and alveolar epithelial cells induced a significant reduction of growth rate and increased senescence markers, including Senescence Associated ß Galactosidase activity, p53, p21, and the histone variant γH2AX. Our findings demonstrate that ZNF365 is upregulated in IPF and experimental lung fibrosis and suggest a protective role since its absence increases experimental lung fibrosis mechanistically associated with the induction of cell senescence.

Syndrome of Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Research Statement.

Background: The presence of emphysema is relatively common in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. This has been designated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). The lack of consensus over definitions and diagnostic criteria has limited CPFE research. Goals: The objectives of this task force were to review the terminology, definition, characteristics, pathophysiology, and research priorities of CPFE and to explore whether CPFE is a syndrome. Methods: This research statement was developed by a committee including 19 pulmonologists, 5 radiologists, 3 pathologists, 2 methodologists, and 2 patient representatives. The final document was supported by a focused systematic review that identified and summarized all recent publications related to CPFE. Results: This task force identified that patients with CPFE are predominantly male, with a history of smoking, severe dyspnea, relatively preserved airflow rates and lung volumes on spirometry, severely impaired DlCO, exertional hypoxemia, frequent pulmonary hypertension, and a dismal prognosis. The committee proposes to identify CPFE as a syndrome, given the clustering of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, shared pathogenetic pathways, unique considerations related to disease progression, increased risk of complications (pulmonary hypertension, lung cancer, and/or mortality), and implications for clinical trial design. There are varying features of interstitial lung disease and emphysema in CPFE. The committee offers a research definition and classification criteria and proposes that studies on CPFE include a comprehensive description of radiologic and, when available, pathological patterns, including some recently described patterns such as smoking-related interstitial fibrosis. Conclusions: This statement delineates the syndrome of CPFE and highlights research priorities.

Latin American Registry of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (REFIPI): Clinical Characteristics, Evolution and Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, irreversible and frequently fatal disease. Currently there are national and multinational registries in Europe, United States, Australia and China to better understand the magnitude of the problem and the characteristics of the IPF patients. However, there are no national or regional registries in Latin America, so the objective of this study was to carry out a Latin American registry that would allow the identification of IPF patients in our region. METHODOLOGY: A system consisting of 3 levels of control was designed, ensuring that patients met the diagnostic criteria for IPF according to international guidelines ATS/ERS/ALAT/JRS 2011. Demographic, clinical, serological, functional, tomographic, histological and treatment variables were recorded through a digital platform. RESULTS: 761 IPF patients from 14 Latin American countries were included for analysis, 74.7% were male, with a mean age of 71.9+8.3 years. In general there was a long period of symptoms before definitive diagnosis (median 1 year). In functional tests, an average reduction of FVC (70.9%) and DLCO (53.7%) was detected. 72% received at least one antifibrotic drug (pirfenidone or nintedanib) and 11.2% of the patients had an acute exacerbation, of which 38 (45.2%) died from this cause. CONCLUSIONS: Like other registries, we found that there is difficulty in the recognition and excessive delay in the diagnosis of IPF in Latin America. Most of the patients in REFIPI received antifibrotics; these were well tolerated and associated with fewer adverse events than those reported in clinical trials.

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) and SNP-SNP Interactions of the Surfactant Protein Genes Are Associated With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Mexican Study Group; Comparison With Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis.

Surfactant proteins (SPs) are important for normal lung function and innate immunity of the lungs and their genes have been identified with significant genetic variability. Changes in quantity or quality of SPs due to genetic mutations or natural genetic variability may alter their functions and contribute to the host susceptibility for particular diseases. Alternatively, SP single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can serve as markers to identify disease risk or response to therapies, as shown for other genes in a number of other studies. In the current study, we evaluated associations of SFTP SNPs with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) by studying novel computational models where the epistatic effects (dominant, additive, recessive) of SNP-SNP interactions could be evaluated, and then compared the results with a previously published hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) study where the same novel models were used. Mexican Hispanic patients (IPF=84 & HP=75) and 194 healthy control individuals were evaluated. The goal was to identify SP SNPs and SNP-SNP interactions that associate with IPF as well as SNPs and interactions that may be unique to each of these interstitial diseases or common between them. We observed: 1) in terms of IPF, i) three single SFTPA1 SNPs to associate with decreased IPF risk, ii) three SFTPA1 haplotypes to associate with increased IPF risk, and iii) a number of three-SNP interactions to associate with IPF susceptibility. 2) Comparison of IPF and HP, i) three SFTPA1 and one SFTPB SNP associated with decreased risk in IPF but increased risk in HP, and one SFTPA1 SNP associated with decreased risk in both IPF and HP, ii) a number of three-SNP interactions with the same or different effect pattern associated with IPF and/or HP susceptibility, iii) one of the three-SNP interactions that involved SNPs of SFTPA1, SFTPA2, and SFTPD, with the same effect pattern, was associated with a disease-specific outcome, a decreased and increased risk in HP and IPF, respectively. This is the first study that compares the SP gene variants in these two phenotypically similar diseases. Our findings indicate that SNPs of all SFTPs may play an important role in the genetic susceptibility to IPF and HP. Importantly, IPF and HP share some SP genetic variants, suggesting common pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways regarding surfactant biogenesis, but also some differences, highlighting the diverse underlying pathogenic mechanisms between an inflammatory-driven fibrosis (HP) and an epithelial-driven fibrosis (IPF). Alternatively, the significant SNPs identified here, along with SNPs of other genes, could serve as markers to distinguish these two devastating diseases.

Novedades diagnósticas y terapéuticas en fibrosis pulmonar progresiva / Diagnostic and Therapeutic Developments in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

Además de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática (FPI), otras enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales difusas (EPID) desarrollan fibrosis pulmonar, lo cual ocurre en una proporción variable en función de la entidad. Este componente fibrótico puede progresar a pesar de las medidas terapéuticas adoptadas, lo que se conoce como fibrosis pulmonar progresiva (FPP). En este contexto, la FPP no es una entidad per se sino una condición clínica o comportamiento común que pueden desarrollar diferentes EPID fibrosantes, la cual compromete el pronóstico del paciente. La FPP se identifica por criterios de empeoramiento clínico, fisiológico y/o radiológico durante el seguimiento del paciente. Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en pacientes con FPI o EPID no-FPI progresiva han demostrado que el tratamiento con medicamentos anti-fibróticos, sea nintedanib o pirfenidona, enlentece su progresión. Actualmente, se abre una nueva era en el manejo clínico de este subgrupo de pacientes y una ventana de oportunidad para investigar incógnitas aún existentes. (AU)

In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are also associated with pulmonary fibrosis and occur in a variable proportion of patients, depending on the entity. The name given to this fibrotic component, that may progress despite treatment, is progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). In this context, PPF is not an entity per se but a common clinical condition or behavior that may occur in association with different types of fibrosing diffuse ILDs, compromising patient prognosis. PPF is identified from worsening clinical, physiological, and/or radiological criteria during patient follow-up. Randomized clinical trials in patients with IPF or progressive non-IPF ILD have shown that treatment with antifibrotic drugs, either nintedanib or pirfenidone, slows progression. We are seeing the start of a new era in the clinical management of this subgroup of patients, offering the perfect opportunity for exploring still uncharted territories. (AU)

[Translated article] Diagnostic and Therapeutic Developments in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis / Novedades diagnósticas y terapéuticas en fibrosis pulmonar progresiva

In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are also associated with pulmonary fibrosis and occur in a variable proportion of patients, depending on the entity. The name given to this fibrotic component, that may progress despite treatment, is progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). In this context, PPF is not an entity per se but a common clinical condition or behavior that may occur in association with different types of fibrosing diffuse ILDs, compromising patient prognosis. PPF is identified from worsening clinical, physiological, and/or radiological criteria during patient follow-up. Randomized clinical trials in patients with IPF or progressive non-IPF ILD have shown that treatment with antifibrotic drugs, either nintedanib or pirfenidone, slows progression. We are seeing the start of a new era in the clinical management of this subgroup of patients, offering the perfect opportunity for exploring still uncharted territories. (AU)

ResumenAdemás de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática (FPI), otras enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales difusas (EPID) desarrollan fibrosis pulmonar, lo cual ocurre en una proporción variable en función de la entidad. Este componente fibrótico puede progresar a pesar de las medidas terapéuticas adoptadas, lo que se conoce como fibrosis pulmonar progresiva (FPP). En este contexto, la FPP no es una entidad per se sino una condición clínica o comportamiento común que pueden desarrollar diferentes EPID fibrosantes, la cual compromete el pronóstico del paciente. La FPP se identifica por criterios de empeoramiento clínico, fisiológico y/o radiológico durante el seguimiento del paciente. Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en pacientes con FPI o EPID no-FPI progresiva han demostrado que el tratamiento con medicamentos anti-fibróticos, sea nintedanib o pirfenidona, enlentece su progresión. Actualmente, se abre una nueva era en el manejo clínico de este subgrupo de pacientes y una ventana de oportunidad para investigar incógnitas aún existentes. (AU)

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (an Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline.

Background: This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. Methods: A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. 1) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. 2) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results:1) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. 2) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. Conclusions: The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.

Antacid Medication and Antireflux Surgery in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fibrosing interstitial pneumonia with impaired survival. Previous guidelines recommend antacid medication to improve respiratory outcomes in patients with IPF. Objectives: This systematic review was undertaken during the development of an American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax guideline. The clinical question was, "Should patients with IPF who have documented abnormal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with or without symptoms of GER disease 1) be treated with antacid medication or 2) undergo antireflux surgery to improve respiratory outcomes?" Methods: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the gray literature were searched through June 30, 2020. Studies that enrolled patients with IPF and 1) compared antacid medication to placebo or no medication or 2) compared antireflux surgery to no surgery were selected. Meta-analyses were performed when possible. Outcomes included disease progression, mortality, exacerbations, hospitalizations, lung function, respiratory symptoms, GER severity, and adverse effects/complications. Results: For antacid medication, when two studies were aggregated, there was no statistically significant effect on disease progression, defined as a 10% or more decline in FVC, more than 50-m decline in 6-minute walking distance, or death (risk ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.03). A separate study that could not be included in the meta-analysis found no statistically significant effect on disease progression when defined as a 5% or more decline in FVC or death (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21) and an increase in disease progression when defined as a 10% or more decline in FVC or death (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.51). For antireflux surgery, there was also no statistically significant effect on disease progression (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.06-1.26). Neither antacid medications nor antireflux surgery was associated with improvements in the other outcomes. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to conclude that antacid medication or antireflux surgery improves respiratory outcomes in patients with IPF, most of whom had not had abnormal GER confirmed. Well-designed and adequately powered prospective studies with objective evaluation for GER are critical to elucidate the role of antacid medication and antireflux surgery for respiratory outcomes in patients with IPF.

Circulating Levels of PD-L1, TIM-3 and MMP-7 Are Promising Biomarkers to Differentiate COVID-19 Patients That Require Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

Background: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Many COVID-19 patients require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) while others, even with acute respiratory failure, do not (NIMV). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate serum levels of MMP-7 and molecules related to exhausted T-cells as potential biomarkers to differentiate between IMV and NIMV patients. Methods: 105 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and confirmed by RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 were divided into two groups according to the requirement for IMV. Serum levels of sPD-L1, sPD-L2, sTIM-3, sGal-9 and sMMP-7 were quantified by ELISA and correlated with clinical data. Twelve patients were followed up after eight months to compare the levels of the biomarkers between acute disease and post-COVID-19. Results: IMV patients experienced a lower PaO2/FiO2 (p < 0.0001) and a longer hospital stay (p < 0.0001), and exhibited higher levels of sPD-L1 (p < 0.05), sTIM-3 (p < 0.01) and sMMP-7 (p < 0.0001) when compared with NIMV patients. According to a ROC analysis, sMMP-7 had the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (76%) with a cut point of 4.5 ng/mL, followed by sTIM-3 and sPD-L1. Eight months post-COVID-19, IMV patients displayed a significant decrease in the initially high levels of sPD-L1, sTIM-3 and sGal-9, while sPD-L2 was increased, and sMMP-7 was unchanged. Conclusion: Circulating levels of sPD-L1, sTIM-3 and sMMP-7 are potential biomarkers of disease severity to distinguish patients requiring IMV. MMP-7 could also be a marker for the persistence of lung lesions post-COVID-19.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Developments in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis. / Novedades diagnósticas y terapéuticas en fibrosis pulmonar progresiva.

In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are also associated with pulmonary fibrosis and occur in a variable proportion of patients, depending on the entity. The name given to this fibrotic component, that may progress despite treatment, is progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). In this context, PPF is not an entity per se but a common clinical condition or behavior that may occur in association with different types of fibrosing diffuse ILDs, compromising patient prognosis. PPF is identified from worsening clinical, physiological, and/or radiological criteria during patient follow-up. Randomized clinical trials in patients with IPF or progressive non-IPF ILD have shown that treatment with antifibrotic drugs, either nintedanib or pirfenidone, slows progression. We are seeing the start of a new era in the clinical management of this subgroup of patients, offering the perfect opportunity for exploring still uncharted territories.

Fibroblasts From Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Induce Apoptosis and Reduce the Migration Capacity of T Lymphocytes.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and irreversible lung disease of unknown etiology. Myofibroblasts are organized in peculiar subepithelial fibroblasts foci (FF), where they abnormally persist and exclude lymphocytes by unclear mechanisms. FF are the source of an excessive extracellular matrix, which results in progressive stiffening and destruction of the lung architecture. We hypothesized that the absence of T cells inside the FF could be related, at least partially, to an inefficient function of lymphocytes induced by IPF fibroblasts. Here, we evaluated the effect of a supernatant from IPF fibroblasts on T-cell apoptosis and migration capacity. Data showed that IPF fibroblasts secrete pro-apoptotic molecules (both from extrinsic and intrinsic pathways), generating a microenvironment that induces apoptosis of T cells at 3 h of culture, despite a weak anti-apoptotic profile exhibited by these T cells. At 24 h of culture, the supernatants from both IPF and control fibroblasts provoked T-cell death. However, at this time of culture, IPF fibroblasts caused a marked decrease in T-cell migration; in contrast, control lung fibroblasts induced an increase of T-cell migration. The reduction of T-cell migratory capacity provoked by IPF fibroblasts was associated with a negative regulation of RHOA and ROCK, two essential GTPases for migration, and was independent of the expression of chemokine receptors. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that IPF fibroblasts/myofibroblasts induce apoptosis and affect T-cell migration, revealing a mechanism involved in the virtual absence of T lymphocytes inside the FF.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is one of the most common interstitial lung diseases (ILD), that presents unique challenges for a confident diagnosis and limited therapeutic options. The disease is triggered by exposure to a wide variety of inciting antigens in susceptible individuals which results in T-cell hyperactivation and bronchioloalveolar inflammation. However, the genetic risk and the pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. Revised diagnostic criteria have recently been proposed, recommending to classify the disease in fibrotic and non-fibrotic HP which has strong therapeutic and outcome consequences. Confident diagnosis depends on the presence of clinical features of ILD, identification of the antigen(s), typical images on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), characteristic histopathological features, and lymphocytosis in the bronchoalveolar lavage. However, identifying the source of antigen is usually challenging, and HRCT and histopathology are often heterogeneous and not typical, supporting the notion that diagnosis should include a multidisciplinary assessment. Antigen removal and treating the inflammatory process is crucial in the progression of the disease since chronic persistent inflammation seems to be one of the mechanisms leading to lung fibrotic remodeling. Fibrotic HP has a few therapeutic options but evidence of efficacy is still scanty. Deciphering the molecular pathobiology of HP will contribute to open new therapeutic avenues and will provide vital insights in the search for novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.